ANON. St Clyde (1816)
Belle Assemblée, n.s. 14 (July 1816): 40–41.
The plot is of itself simple. A Highland Laird obtains for his
son a commission in the invincible and ever renowned 42d regiment.
This son is supposed to fall in battle; his father, the Laird of
St. Clyde, is found drowned in a lake; and Monsieur Villejuive,
his brother-in-law, gets possession of the estate of St. Clyde.
The son returns after some years absence; the uncle flies; the murderer
of the Laird is found out, and this miscreant is, we are led to
infer, the uncle Villejuive.
But though this is the outline of the plot there are numerous circumstances
connected with the division of it, developing the causes which led
to Colin St. Clyde’s going into the army, the murder of his
father, and the discovery of this diabolical affair, the villainy
of Villejuive in depriving Ellen St. Clyde of her patrimonial estate,
with a variety of other circumstances some of equal and others of
minor importance linked therewith. And the author placing his hero
in the 42d regiment affords him an extensive field for that irregularity
of genius he displays. It was on the heights of Abraham the 42d,
or as they were called the Black Watch, first evinced the
savage and hitherto invincible bravery of the Highland warriors.
The author of St. Clyde is the unrivalled historian of a
Highland Farewell; and he manages the description with a
feeling which appears to have a common fellowship in the departure
of Colin St. Clyde’s recruits. But we will not destroy the
pleasure our readers may anticipate from this morceau; the
description is not too long and yet it is spun to the utmost—but
it could not want a single sentence, for though the ideas are many,
not one could be dispensed with.
We are sorry we cannot speak with equal warmth of the Scottish
Wedding at Millhole. It is much too long, from a minuteness of the
author to leave nothing unnoticed—but with this fault it is
really an original; we look in vain for anything similar to it in
any other novel—because it is a Scottish wedding—and
will be read with delight by young and old.
As to the descriptive scenery and local manners of the characters,
since the tale is evidently from the pen of a native of Scotland,
we find the topographical allusions true to the veriest village,
glen, wood, and loch. The author takes his characters just as he
finds them, observing however always to make them support their
several parts in the drama with all the national pride, superstition,
presbyterianism, cunning, learning, perseverance, and clannish attachment
for which the north is so famous. We conceive, upon the whole, that
our readers by perusing St. Clyde will derive as much information
as from any thing of the kind that could be thrown together in a
hurry, and without much respect to the taste of Englishmen.
There is one thing we cannot omit to notice—the political
opinions which run through these volumes, not that we imagine that
the author is a rank Jacobite—No; but he is evidently one
who sympathizes with a feeling that has scarcely a fellow in all
the misfortunes which befel the house of Stuart.
But we have not yet noticed the language in which St. Clyde
is written. The greater part of the plot, scenery, and personages
are laid, described, and settled in Scotland: and, as might naturally
be expected, a great [40/41] portion of these volumes is written
in the dialect of that country. After the success with which this
innovation has been attended in the popular novels of Waverly
[sic] and Guy Mannering, St. Clyde comes
before us fearless as to the consequences of such a deviation from
long established custom. Yet with these innovations we can speak
to the moral purity of the composition of this novel, and we have
little doubt that, viewing it as we do, the first essay of one whose
talents have evidently been applied to compositions of another and
more arduous kind, we can recommend to the perusal of our readers
the novel of St. Clyde.
Notes: No format or price given.
Monthly Review, 2nd ser. 79 (Apr 1816): 448.
To the writer of the long MS. relative to St. Clyde, we
repeat the answer just given to another Correspondent.
Notes: Listed under ‘Correspondence’. The previous
correspondent was told that their remarks would be considered, but
‘we never accept anonymous contributions.’
Monthly Review, 2nd ser. 80 (July 1816): 320–21.
For the last year or two, the novel-readers in this island have
been indebted for much amusement to Scotish [sic] writers;
and they have been so pleasantly initiated into the northern dialect
by the perusal of ‘Waverley,’ ‘Guy Mannering,’
&c. that a moderate admixture of it in other tales proves attractive
rather than alarming. The author of ‘St. Clyde,’ however,
has composed too palpable an imitation of those works; and he has
exceeded the present licence for writing Scotch, since he not only
makes almost all his characters speak unintelligibly, but allows
himself to narrate in such language as they employ. For instances
[sic], he speaks, in Vol. ii. p. 32. of ‘a wondrous
pavement that stretched far beneath [320/321] the dolesome
deep;’—‘being now very old and frail,
his suspicions were roused by observing some corbies,’
&c.—Vol. iii. p. 144. ‘longsome pleasure.’
—264. ‘There was little fear of a disclosure from Charles’s
being transmewed into, as Dr. Boston, professor and lecturer
on botany,’ &c. &c.
The tale is, moreover, too much crowded with personages, and appears
to be a hasty performance: yet the description in the first volume
of a march of recruits is natural and somewhat affecting: the story
is not without variety; and the writer seems to be well acquainted
with the scenery and customs which he delineates.
Notes: Listed under ‘Monthly Catalogue: Novels’. Format:
3 vols 12mo; price 15s. Boards. Publisher: Gale & Fenner.
© 2004 Project Director: Professor
Research Associates: Dr Jacqueline
Belanger, Dr Sharon Ragaz;
Database/Website Developer: Dr Anthony