|
PORTER, Jane. Pastor's Fire-Side, The (1817)
Contemporary Reviews
Monthly Review, 2nd ser. 83 (May 1817): 97–98.
[Heading only appears on p. 97, body of review is on p. 98]
Something like disappointment will probably be caused by the title
of this work; and readers, who expect the gentle and domestic scenes
of a ‘Pastor’s Fire-side,’ will be surprized at
finding themselves carried into palaces and dungeons, and to fields
of battle: but the tale displays a great variety of incident, with
much justness of thought; and the character of Louis de Ripperda
is a touching and finely conceived picture of filial piety and heroic
self-denial. The fair writer has, however, taken great liberties
with the historical facts on which her novel is grounded. For example:
she makes a pathetic scene of the death of Ripperda’s wife,
whereas the Duchess de Ripperda outlived her husband;—in
order to place Louis in the questionable situation of fighting
in a lawful cause against his father, she confounds the Duke
de Montemar with the son of Ripperda;—and, after the
disgrace of Ripperda, she carries him at once into Africa, entirely
sinking three intermediate years which he passed in England. We
will not censure her for omitting all mention of ‘the fair
Castilian’ who was the companion of his flight: but we may
notice her injustice to another lady, the Countess de Blaggay, who
was not, as Miss Porter calls her, a woman of mean birth, but born
Countess de Coblentz. As Miss P. seems to have intended Philip Duke
of Wharton for one of the most agreeable characters, it was injudicious
to represent him as playing off an unfeeling and disgusting joke
on Louis in the childhood of the latter; and we overcame not the
dislike excited by this incident, till we recollected that the occurrence
was impossible, because Wharton was born in 1699, and, as Louis
is supposed to have been grown up at the period of his father’s
embassy to Vienna in 1722, he and his friend must have been nearly
of the same age.
We need not trouble our readers by mentioning any farther incongruities:
but we must notice a few verbal inaccuracies; such as, (vol. i.
page 89.) ‘is there no terms to be kept?’—(Page
113.) ‘He who Cromwell sent to the scaffold.’—(Page
152.) ‘A man who he loves.’—(Page 273.)
‘Their vapoury lights lit him along.’—(Vol.
ii. page 58.) ‘To engloom an evil prospect.’—(Page
65.) ‘The sovereigns themselves were principles, and
that they should be principles was astonishing.’—(Page
134.) ‘Icy peaks of the glaziers.’—(Page
298.) ‘The Queen knows how ably you fulfilled your duties,
and herself suggested to the King rewarding your zeal.’—(Page
302.) ‘The colonnades were lit up.’—(Page
355.) ‘Yourself has separated us,’ &c. &c.
Notes: Listed under ‘Monthly Catalogue: Novels’. Format:
4 vols 12mo; price 1l. 11s. 6d. Boards. Publisher: Longman &
Co.
Print | Close

© 2004 Project Director: Professor
Peter Garside;
Research Associates: Dr Jacqueline
Belanger, Dr Sharon Ragaz;
Database/Website Developer: Dr Anthony
Mandal
|